Author Archives Laura Arnold

Duke Energy looks to cooperate with states on EPA’s Clean Power Plan as it mulls a challenge

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 02, 2015  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Duke Energy looks to cooperate with states on EPA's Clean Power Plan as it mulls a challenge

by 

Duke Energy executive Jennifer Weber says the power company will focus on working with state officials on how to implement the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan as it considers whether to challenge the program.

“That is under consideration,” she said. “But for now we are leaving that aside to work with our states on what compliance looks like.”

Weber, Duke’s executive vice president of external affairs and strategic policy, was in Washington Wednesday to speak on a panel organized by the Progressive Policy Institute.

‘Investment drought’

PPI used the discussion of private investment to outline the results of its new report, “U.S. Investment Heroes of 2015,” which identifies 25 large companies — including Duke — that are bucking the trend of what PPI sees as an “investment drought” in the United States.

Weber told the audience the principal drivers for investment at Duke are changes in what customers expect from their power companies, new technology and the opportunities it creates, and public policy.

After the event, she spoke with the Charlotte Business Journal in a telephone interview.

Market forces

Weber said taxes remain a key public-policy issue for capital-intensive companies such as Duke. She said lower state and federal rates would spur investment. So would a revamping of federal taxes on repatriating money that U.S. companies earn overseas for investment in the United States.

She also said policymakers should always consider what can be accomplished by market forces without regulation. She contends the current low cost of natural gas and the rapid drop in the costs of solar and other renewable-energy sources occurred largely in the absence of new regulation.

So, she said, the more the Clean Power Plan can rely on those kind of market forces, the more successful it will be.

New services

On new technology, she cited advancements in renewables and battery storage as key innovations. Duke utilities are investing in building solar plants in North Carolina and Florida. She also said government polices to encourage investment in research and development would be helpful.

On changing customer expectations, she cited demand for more billing options and for greater access to buying clean energy. “We are looking for new energy services in which we could be energy advisers for our customers,” she said.

Some of those services may be offered as part of the services Duke already provides customers. Others will likely be offered as premium services, which customers can pay for separately.

Six states

Weber says Duke has no timetable on when it will decide whether to challenge the Clean Power Plan. She notes it is a comprehensive and complex regulatory plan.

The plan sets separate requirements for every state and instructs the states to propose the methods for achieving them.

Duke operates in six states — the Carolinas, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio — and must consider the impact on its operations in each state as it decides whether to object to the plan.

John Downey covers the energy industry and public companies for the Charlotte Business Journal.

 

What do Republicans think about clean energy? 68% Conservative Reps. support clean energy

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 01, 2015  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized, wind  /   No Comments

What do Republicans think about clean energy?

Apex Clean Energy continues to advocate wind turbines in Rush County (IN)

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 01, 2015  /   Posted in Uncategorized, wind  /   No Comments
Apex Clean Energy logo9/30/2015 10:44:00 AM
Apex Clean Energy continues to advocate wind turbines in Rush County

 

 

Kevin L. Green, Courier-TimesApex Clean Energy isn't giving up on Rush County, despite a recent vote by the county commissioners there to cease negotiations with the company."Apex Clean Energy is still committed to working with Rush County to develop a wind energy project that works for (that) community," Apex Clean Energy President and CEO Mark Goodwin said.

On Sept. 8, the Rush County Commissioners unanimously voted to cease talks with Apex about the placement of large wind turbines commonly referred to as the Flat Rock Wind Farm. Following the vote to cease negotiations with Apex, Rush County Commissioner Paul Wilkinson said he and his fellow commissioners voted the way a majority of their constituents preferred.

The company's original plan was to place approximately 65 wind turbines in Rush County, a roughly $200 million investment, and as many as 29 turbines in Henry County, an investment of nearly $100 million.

"We know there is more work to be done, and we are committed to continuing our efforts to help the community understand this project and our company. Apex and its private sector financial partners plan to invest about $300 million dollars in the development of this clean energy project," Goodwin said. "Both science and history support the fact that local development of wind energy is safe and beneficial for local communities, and we are personally invested in helping to educate the community about these facts."

According to Goodwin, Flat Rock Wind will generate more than $18 million in additional revenue for Rush and Henry counties, including the Rush County and Southern Henry County school districts. According to a report prepared by Umbaugh, Southern Henry County schools would receive an estimated $900,000 in additional revenue over a 25 year period if the project becomes a reality.

Rush County Economic and Community Development Corp. Executive Director John McCane indicated he is hopeful county officials and Apex representatives can reach an agreement both sides are satisfied with.

"The Rush County ECDC has been a proponent of wind energy from the time when the County, and the Agriculture Committee began work on a comprehensive ag zoning ordinance for Rush County in 1998. We believe wind energy to be a positive economic opportunity because Rush County has the wind resource, the investment is great, and the impact on local services is practically nonexistent," McCane said.

Apex has filed a legal appeal regarding a decision made by the Rush County Board of Zoning Appeals that allowed for construction of the turbines but which changed setback requirements for the turbines from 1,000 feet to 2,300 feet.

At New Castle-Henry County Economic Development Corp. President and CEO Corey Murphy's urging, the Henry County Commissioners have voted to continue to work with Apex with or without Rush County as a partner in the proposed project. It is unclear at this time if the project is feasible without Rush County's participation.

Apex is one of two companies that have expressed an interest in placing wind turbines in the Fayette, Henry and Rush County area. The other is the NextEra Energy Resourcesproject, commonly referred to as the Whitewater Wind Farm. It involves placement of approximately 77 wind turbines including 43 in Fayette County, 25 in Rush County, and eight in southeastern Henry County.

City of Logansport Announces Third Proposal for LMU Powerplant; Candidates for Mayor Disagree

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 01, 2015  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Just in time, Logansport announces power plant plans

LOGANSPORT, Ind. (WLFI) – Logansport city leaders hope the third time proves to be the charm to provide energy to its citizens.

After months of delays, Mayor Ted Franklin (R) announced a deal Wednesday with SG Preston to retrofit the city’s power plant as well as expand energy production, possibly providing Logansport with millions in cash every year.

But the mayor’s opponent, Dave Kitchell (D), in November’s election disagrees.

The deal comes after about three years of work.

“It’s a relief for me,” said Franklin.

It’s a three-phased project to invest in the city’s coal-fired power plant. If not for the public-private partnership, due to regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency, the plant would have to close by January.

Franklin says Phase 1 will retrofit the plant to burn a mix of coal and pelletized fuel, which combine to pollute less than either separately.

“The two of them blend and they cause the two elements to stick together and actually make it easier for it to collect in the filters before it’s emitted into the atmosphere,” said Franklin.

But as News 18 has already reported, twice before, similar agreements with other developers have fallen through.

Franklin says this one is different and is farther along, in part because of the number of engineers associated with SG Preston he’s met, as well as the money.

“I personally have met with the people who will do the financing and that’s farther than we’ve ever been before,” said Franklin. “It’s more than a closed circle this time. It’s actually bringing in those people who have the checkbook.”

Franklin says Phase 2 will add another 90 megawatts of power through a combination of natural gas and steam. Phase 3 would add about 80 megawatts through pellet fuel. In total, it’s a $250-300 million investment, which almost matches the entire assessed value of the city which currently stands at $350 million.

While there’s no guarantee the latter two phases will be built, Franklin says that’s where the money will be recouped by investors.

“Phase 1 is basically a BAND-AID, a prop up that would allow SG Preston to build Phase 2 and 3 where the real money is to be made,” said Franklin.

He says the only way Logansport will not recoup its $1.6 million in consultant fees is if the pelletized blend retrofit doesn’t meet government approval. If it does, the city will bank an extra $150,000. He says SG Preston will have a pair of 30-day windows to test burn so that IDEM can approve the mixture.

As for the utility costs to city costumers, Franklin says the initial rate will be 7.3 cents per kilowatt hour, with a ceiling at 8.35 cents per kWh in 20 years, which is still under the 8.5 cents per kWh customers pay now.

“The cost of electricity 20 years from now will be less than it is today,” said Franklin.

Franklin also says when all three phases are complete, the city could make about $3 million annually just from extra sales to the nation’s power grid. The agreement calls for the city to receive one percent of energy sales to Logansport citizens and three percent for all sales to the grid.

The deal is for 25 years, with an option for SG Preston to renew for another 25 years. Franklin says it’s the best deal available.

“We’ve generated electricity for for 110 years now,” said Franklin. “This will insure that we’re going to be generating electricity at least another 50. So I’m happy to hang my hat on that.”

Franklin says four agreements still need approval from the Utilities Service Board, the city council and the Board of Works: a purchase power agreement, a lease agreement, a build-operate-transfer agreement and an interim agreement to allow SG Preston to test the pellet blend.

Franklin says the series of votes will begin Oct. 13.

Franklin says the city will not collect property taxes on the property because they will own the land. However, they will be able to tax all equipment.

Kitchell, Franklin’s opponent in the November election, tells News 18 he does not believe this deal is best.

In an email, he wrote:

“Unfortunately, the deal the mayor has struck at the 11th hour in his four-year term comes without any assurance that the pellet fuel used will be allowed by the Environmental Protection Agency in five or 10 years or that the city will be compensated for its investment if the pellet fuel is not permitted, just as coal has been phased out by EPA regulations. S.G. Preston has not been transparent about the content of the pellets and the emissions that will be added to the heart of Logansport by increased use of the plant. The kilowatt rate he wants is not the lowest rate available to the Logansport Municipal Utilities ratepayers, and it discounts any future negotiations with Duke Energy which has provided power to Logansport for decades or even entertaining a proposal from the Indiana Municipal Power Agency which operates in five dozen Indiana cities and is associated with the vast majority of Indiana’s public utilities. At a time when Logansport has lost more than 100 full-time, high-paying jobs in the last week at its signature industrial park employer, the mayor should have taken a step back and not held future economic development efforts hostage to a flawed plan. His actions could be detrimental to the Logansport economy for decades.”

Columbus Dispatch: Panel will advise that freeze on Ohio’s clean-energy rules be continued

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 30, 2015  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
EAMON QUEENEY | DISPATCH FILE PHOTO Wind turbines generate electricity on a farm straddling Paulding and Van Wert counties in northwest Ohio.
 

Panel will advise that freeze on Ohio’s clean-energy rules be continued

By Dan GearinoThe Columbus Dispatch  •  Wednesday September 30, 2015 12:33 AM

A two-year freeze of Ohio’s clean-energy standards would become indefinite under recommendations that legislative Republicans are set to announce today.

The proposal follows about a year of hearings by the Energy Mandates Study Committee, a joint House-Senate panel, and is likely to be greeted with loud objections from advocates for renewable energy and energy efficiency.

The committee will cite the federal Clean Power Plan as the main reason for continuing the freeze in state standards, saying that Ohio needs to maintain flexibility to deal with the federal rules, according to a draft of the report obtained from a committee member by TheDispatch.

An open-ended freeze “is the best path forward for Ohio,” the draft says.

Sen. Troy Balderson, R-Zanesville, co-chairman of the committee, confirmed on Tuesday night that the indefinite freeze will be among the recommendations today, and he expressed disappointment that a member of the panel disclosed the draft report before its official release.

“This uncertainty with the (Clean Power Plan) is real,” he said, explaining why he thinks the ongoing freeze is needed.

The Clean Power Plan is overseen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and sets state-by-state goals for reducing carbon emissions.

Rep. Mike Stinziano, D-Columbus, who provided the report to TheDispatch, said an indefinite freeze is bad for the economy.

“We would be hurting our ability to attract and retain clean jobs,” he said, adding that his thoughts are based on conversations he’s had with central Ohio business leaders who have concerns that the state appears hostile to clean-energy technologies.

The energy standards are part of a 2008 state law that said utilities must meet escalating annual benchmarks for energy efficiency and renewable energy. The two-year freeze was imposed by a 2014 law signed by Gov. John Kasich and following a long and bitter debate, with utilities and some businesses supporting it and many others opposing it.

The 2014 law set up the special committee to continue looking at the subject, with a deadline of today to issue a final report.

It is now up to the Ohio General Assembly to decide whether to turn the recommendations into a new bill, and attempt to pass it.

Dispatch Reporter Jim Siegel contributed to this story.

dgearino@dispatch.com

@DanGearino

 

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG