Author Archives Laura Arnold

HB 1072 Conferees Appointed; Will Chairman Espich Keep Indiana Solar PV Property Tax Exemption in HB 1072?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 06, 2012  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Uncategorized  /   1 Comments

UPDATE: The Conference Committee for HB 1072 will be TODAY (3/6/2012) at 4:00 pm in Room 404 of the State House.

To watch on-line, please see http://www.in.gov/legislative/2441.htm

The 2012 session of the Indiana General Assembly is entering its final week where the focus turns to Conference Committees to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of bills passed in their respective houses.

After a bill passes Third Reading or final passage in both houses, it returns to the "house of origin" and the original bill author. In the case of HB 1072, it returns to Rep. Jeff Espich (R-Uniondale). Espich then has two choices; 1) concur with the changes made in the second house  followed by a roll call vote;  or 2) dissent and have a conference committee appointed to reconcile the differences. Espich filed a dissent motion for HB 1072 and the conference committee members or conferees have been appointed as follows:

House Conferees appointed: Espich, Chairman (R-Uniondale) and Welch (D-Bloomington)

House Advisors appointed: Turner (R), Thompson (R), Ellspermann (R), Ubelhor (R), Dembowski (D) and Pryor (D)

Senate Conferees appointed: Hershman (R-Buck Creek) and Broden (D-South Bend)

Senate Advisors appointed: Kenley (R), Mishler (R), Head (R) and Skinner (D)

The conference committee then meets at the will of the Chairman, in this case, Espich. The four conferees meet with their appointed advisors and work on a new version of HB 1072. Subject matter or content that has passed third reading in at least one House is eligible to be inserted into the Conference Committee Report (CCR). For example, it is believed that the tax credit for the controversial Indiana Gasification, LLC plant in Rockport, Indiana, may be inserted into HB 1072. The subject matter concerning Indiana Gasification, LLC was a part of SB 344 when it passed third reading in the Senate but it was removed by an amendment in the House Ways and Means Committee. (See http://wp.me/pMRZi-CI) Later SB 344 was not called down for second reading in the House (31 amendments had been filed). Therefore, SB 344 died. But most of the subject matter had already been inserted into HB 1072 in the Senate Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee by Sen. Hershman. HB 1072 then passed third reading in the Senate.

HB 1072 now contains the property tax exemption for solar photovoltaic (PV) devices, however, with a simple stroke of a pen Rep. Espich can have the language removed from his proposed version of the Conference Committee Report (CCR). Rep. Espich already removed the solar PV property tax exemption once in SB 344 in the House Ways and Means Committee. The $64,000 question is will Espich remove the solar PV property tax exemption again from the CCR for HB 1072 or will he permit it to stay?

As the conferees on HB 1072 meet, all four conferees must agree to a particular version of the revised bill known as a Conference Committee Report (CCR). After all four signatures are obtained, the CCR returns to both the House and the Senate for another roll call vote. There is no opportunity to amend a CR when it goes back to the House and the Senate. It is an up or down roll call vote. This is where the legislative process becomes like a tarantella becoming faster and faster until the end.

There is a strong rationale for extending the property tax exemption to solar PV since it is already in effect for solar thermal, wind power devices and geothermal. Last session, however, Sen. Hershman amended the property tax exemption for wind systems so that the property tax exemption cannot be used if the owner is participating in a feed-in tariff program. Attempts were made to amend this language in the House Ways and Means Committee on SB 344 but these efforts proved unsuccessful. Hershman indicated that this issue should be addressed by "introducing a bill next session." And then SB 344 died in the House.

If your state legislator is either a conferee or an advisor, I strongly urge that you contact them immediately and express support for the inclusion of the solar PV property tax exemption in the CCR for HB 1072. Just follow the hyperlink to their official website listed above. You may also want to follow up with a phone call to their Legislative Assistant (L.A.) If you need help finding this information, please contact me via LArnold@indy.rr.com or (317) 635-1701.

To better understand the Indiana General Assembly state legislative processes please see this document prepared by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce. It contains a flow chart which attempts to explain the legislative process in Indiana as well as providing an excellent glossary of terms. How a bill becomes a law

For more information about the Indiana General Assembly, please visit http://www.in.gov/legislative.

Post-Tribune (IN) EDITORIAL: Solar farms are short on details

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 05, 2012  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO), Uncategorized  /   No Comments
Reprinted at: http://www.indianaeconomicdigest.net/main.asp?SectionID=31&subsectionID=306&articleID=64030

2/18/2012 12:37:00 PM

Post-Tribune Original article: http://posttrib.suntimes.com/opinions/10640914-474/solar-farms-are-short-on-details.html

Why Ecos Renewable Energy isn’t being more forthcoming with information about a series of proposed solar panel farms in Lake and Porter counties seems a bit of a mystery. None of the four would-be local farms — proposed for Hobart, Merrillville, and Portage and Union townships in Porter County — is in a sensitive area, and at least the first areas appear to be welcoming the plants with open arms.Only the Union Township site received any negative feedback, as some neighbors in the area had concerns about noise and property value effects, leading the Porter County Board of Zoning Appeals to turn down the plan. Officials elsewhere have been happy about the investment in their communities.

Yet, Ecos, a Minnesota-based company, won’t discuss its local plans, nor others they may be developing here or around the state. According to a Northern Indiana Public Service Co. spokesman, Ecos has made “quite a few” proposals to the utility, which would buy the energy the plants produce.

Alternative energy projects have attracted much attention in recent years, as traditional fuels become more expensive and pollution has become a greater concern. Although wind power has some critics, negative stories have been minimal on solar power, which has improved over the years enough that even areas such as Indiana, which aren’t that sunny, can produce power from the sun.

These proposed solar plants seem like a good thing, and they should be built. It would be easier to support them, though, if their builders would tell us that in their own words.

Porter County (IN) nixes one solar farm, delays decision on second

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 05, 2012  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO), Uncategorized  /   No Comments
Dear Blog Readers:Sorry that I missed this story last month. I will look to find a more current update on these proposed solar projects in Porter County.

Laura Ann Arnold

Reprinted from http://www.indianaeconomicdigest.net/main.asp?SectionID=31&subsectionID=306&articleID=63816

2/3/2012 12:56:00 PM

Amy Lavalley, Post-Tribune Correspondent
VALPARAISO — The Porter County Board of Zoning Appeals nixed a solar farm planned for Union Township and continued a decision on a second in Portage Township, pending information on landscaping on the site and the zoning of nearby land.The decisions, on the first solar farms in the county, came at a Wednesday public hearing on the matter, during which several Union Township landowners expressed concern about noise and property values. The plan for Portage Township garnered some support, though a resident of a nearby subdivision was unhappy with the proposal for the same reasons as the people in Union Township.The similar plans – the Portage Township solar farm is slightly larger – call for solar panels on 11 acres on each site. Energy collected at them would be sold to Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Representatives from Minnesota-based Ecos Energy said they are serving as development consultants for private investors. Ecos also is involved with plans for solar farms in Hobart and Merrillville.

The BZA voted down the Union Township site, south of Ind. 130 at 495 W. County Road 450 North, with a 4-1 vote. The Portage Township proposal is on the southwest corner of Robbins Road and North County Road 450 West, just outside the city limits.

The Portage Township site is zoned for light industrial, while the Union Township plan was for land zoned rural residential/light industrial, causing consternation for nearby neighbors.

“I cannot see how this is going to improve my property values,” said Bill Tharp, who lives cross the street. “I do not understand why we would ever want to do this, especially in a residential area.”

Chris Little, director of development for Ecos, and Brad Wilson, the company’s project manager, said a solar farm was a better use for the land for neighbors than a warehouse or other facility that would generate heavy traffic or emissions.

That wasn’t enough to sway the board.

“I think it’s a good project. Renewable energy, everyone’s for that. I don’t think it’s the right property,” board member Rick Burns said. “I think it’s a good idea. I don’t think it’s the right location.”

Little and Young said that, through their pending agreement with NIPSCO, the solar farms must be located at the selected sites.

“If we move the project, the project dies,” Little said.

Hobart (IN) Board of Zoning Appeals approves city’s first solar panel business

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 05, 2012  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO), Uncategorized  /   No Comments

By Deborah Laverty deborah.laverty@nwi.com, (219) 762-1397, ext. 2223 nwitimes.com                                

Posted: Thursday, March 1, 2012 11:00 pm

Read more: http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/lake/hobart/hobart-board-approves-city-s-first-solar-panel-business/article_7d342503-d5ce-5b62-a6ad-cf85f8078b34.html#ixzz1oFsYmyX9

HOBART | The Board of Zoning  Appeals said yes Wednesday to Hobart's first solar generating  plant.

The board unanimously  approved a conditional use petition after a public hearing where a few  residents asked questions but offered no negative feedback.

Hobart Solar LLC, a Minnesota-based company, plans to erect 4,576 solar  panels on about 10 acres of a 50-acre parcel one-fourth mile from the northwest  corner of Liverpool Road and 49th Avenue, petitioner Brad Wilson said.

The project, which could be built as early as this summer, would  consist of modules — they would collect solar rays that would be converted  to energy — and an equipment pad.

The entire project would be enclosed with a fence, Wilson said.

Environmentalist Sandy O'Brien, a Hobart resident, asked that the  project be placed toward the front of the property, near 49th Avenue, away  from an Indiana Department of Natural Resources managed nature  preserve.

"I hope this is a win, win for Hobart," O'Brien said.

Wilson said the intent is to place the project closer to 49th Avenue but  the exact location will be determined at a future Plan Commission meeting.

The City Council at its meeting Feb. 15 set the stage for the public  hearing by approving a new renewable energy ordinance for the city, City Planner  A.J. Bytnar said.

That ordinance spells out regulations for future businesses such as the  proposed solar generating plant on 49th Avenue, Bytnar said.

The Plan Commission on Feb. 2 agreed to give Hobart Solar LLC a favorable  recommendation to the Board of Zoning Appeals.

The project will now go back before the Plan Commission for site plan review,  Bytnar said.

If Hobart officials approve the plans, the solar power project would be the  second of two planned for the area by the company, which also goes by Lincoln  Solar LLC.

The Merrillville Town Council in late January unanimously  approved a variance allowing Lincoln Solar LLC to erect 6,800 solar panels to  produce electricity, which would be sold to NIPSCO.

Read more: http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/lake/hobart/hobart-board-approves-city-s-first-solar-panel-business/article_7d342503-d5ce-5b62-a6ad-cf85f8078b34.html#ixzz1oFXs7MvY

Abound Solar CEO: ‘Unfair Competition’ Hurting Company; Says Chinese solar companies selling below cost

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 01, 2012  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   1 Comments

http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?ID=52459

updated: 3/1/2012 8:57:26 AM

Andy Ober, InsideINdianaBusiness.com

 Witsoe says U.S. companies must develop new technology to compete globally.

The chief executive officer of Abound Solar says Chinese solar technology companies selling products below cost are hurting operations in Indiana and Colorado. Craig Witsoe says Asian companies are driving down prices to the point that American businesses can't compete. Despite recent layoffs in Colorado, Witsoe says Abound Solar is still committed to expanding operations in Tipton, and hopes to do so by late 2013.

Witsoe says some lawmakers are in favor of imposing tariffs on Chinese solar products. He says if that happens, competition will become level and the company could add employees sooner.

Abound Solar announced a temporary reduction of approximately 180 jobs in Colorado as part of a transition to its next generation solar modules.

The company announced plans in 2010 for more than 800 jobs in Tipton County.

Source: About Solar, Inside INdiana Business

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG