Author Archives Laura Arnold

Climate Change Roundtable Discussion Scheduled July 9th at IUPUI

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   July 01, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
What Are the Local Impacts of Climate Change?
A Public Round Table Discussion

Environment America and the Richard G. Lugar Center for Renewable Energy at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) will host a public round table event to discuss a recent report released by the U.S. Global Change Research Program on the impacts of climate change in the U.S. Expert speakers will give their reactions to the report and talk about the impacts of climate change from their individual perspectives.

THURSDAY, JULY 9TH
12:00 pm
IUPUI CAMPUS CENTER, ROOM CE 305
420 University Blvd.Indianapolis, IN 46202

Panelists:

Bill Keith, President, SunRise Solar
Reverend Mike Mather, Broadway United Methodist Church
Dr. Gabriel Filippelli, Chair, Department of Earth Science, IUPUI
Jimmy Bricker, County Extension Director, Benton County
Representative, Truman National Security Project

Parking and Directions:
https://www.parking.iupui.edu/visitors.do
http://www.iupui.edu/about/maps/directions.html

Access to report:
http://globalchange.gov/publications/reports/scientific-assessments/usimpacts/newsroom

Contacts:
LuCinda Hohmann, Environment America: 312-291-0696 x220
Kyle Cline, Richard Lugar Center for Renewable Energy: 317-278-4723

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   July 01, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
What Are the Local Impacts of Climate Change?
A Public Round Table Discussion

Environment America and the Richard G. Lugar Center for Renewable Energy at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) will host a public round table event to discuss a recent report released by the U.S. Global Change Research Program on the impacts of climate change in the U.S. Expert speakers will give their reactions to the report and talk about the impacts of climate change from their individual perspectives.

THURSDAY, JULY 9TH
12:00 pm
IUPUI CAMPUS CENTER, ROOM CE 305
420 University Blvd.Indianapolis, IN 46202

Panelists:

Bill Keith, President, SunRise Solar

Reverend Mike Mather, Broadway United Methodist Church
Dr. Gabriel Filippelli, Chair, Department of Earth Science, IUPUI
Jimmy Bricker, County Extension Director, Benton County
Representative, Truman National Security Project

Parking and Directions:
https://www.parking.iupui.edu/visitors.do
http://www.iupui.edu/about/maps/directions.html

Access to report:
http://globalchange.gov/publications/reports/scientific-assessments/usimpacts/newsroom

Contacts:
LuCinda Hohmann, Environment America: 312-291-0696 x220Kyle Cline, Richard Lugar Center for Renewable Energy: 317-278-4723

NW Indiana Business Owner Keith Lobbies for Clean Energy Bill

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 28, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments


Bill Keith, President of SunRise Solar, Inc. in St. John, IN, was in Washington, D.C. earlier this week to lobby for passage of HR 2454, the American Clean Energy & Security Act. Keith was invited to participate in a press conference conducted by Congressman Henry Waxman (in front of the microphones) and Keith is the fourth person to the right of Waxman in the photo wearing the blue tie and jacket. Keith's head is in front of the green sign that says "YES TO GREEN JOBS".

The U.S. House of Representatives began voting Friday evening shortly after 7:00 pm on HR 2454, the American Clean Energy & Security Act. The bill passed narrowly by a vote of 219 to 212.
The members of the Indiana Congressional Delegation voted as follows:
YES:
Carson (D), Hill (D)
NO:
Donnelly (D), Ellsworth (D), Visclosky (D);
Burton (R), Buyer (R), Pence (R), Souder (R)
For a complete analysis of the roll call vote on HR 2454 see http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/house/1/477
E-mail from Bill Keith to Shari Taylor Davenport, Office of Pete Visclosky:

Shari,

Thanks for the response, but I have some reservations about Pete’s stance…… [News release from Congreessman Pete Visclosky follows.]

The air in NWI is dirty (it stinks), the water is being polluted, the cancer rate is 8th in the nation, and Pete is still holding on to the old way of doing business. I know what he is thinking, “If I lose the Gary (Lake County) vote then I lose the next election.” The educated public can see right through this Shari, and it may come back to bite him in the rear end.

I appreciate that Pete works hard for industry, but it is time for a NEW industry – one that is CLEAN!

This transition to a clean energy economy WILL happen, either on Pete’s watch or on the next guys watch – MY generation and my children’s generation demand it!

Respectfully,

Bill Keith
SunRise Solar Inc.
PO Box 53
St John, IN 46373
219-558-2211
219-306-4571 fax

Taking GREEN......Mainstream!

In the News

Congressman Pete Visclosky
Proudly Representing Indiana’s 1st Congressional District
2256 Rayburn Building
Washington, D.C.
TELE: 202-225-2461
7895 Broadway, Suite A
Merrillville, IN 46410
TELE: 219-795-1844

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 26, 2009

Visclosky Votes Against Cap and Trade Legislation
Legislation Would Threaten Competitiveness and Jobs in Northwest Indiana

Washington, D.C. – Congressman Pete Visclosky issued the following statement today after voting no on the American Clean Energy and Security Act, legislation that would establish a cap and trade regime to reduce carbon emissions in the U.S.:

“Climate change is real. It is a serious problem that threatens our way of life, and I am committed to working to solve it.

“Although significant progress has been made on this bill on a number of fronts that would hold down the cost of electricity to residential and industrial customers and help level the playing field for our steel and manufacturing industries that face international competition, the bill still falls short.

“The legislation considered today leaves no margin of error as it relates to jobs in the domestic steel industry, stoking my greatest fear that it will result in a net loss of jobs in Northwest Indiana. I remain seriously concerned about the long-term ramifications that this unilateral action to combat climate change will have on American competitiveness and American workers. We can’t just hope that other countries will follow suit and choose to act concurrently. Additionally, from my perspective this legislation assumes no growth in American industry, including steel.

“I see the need for climate change legislation, but we still have more work to do before this package is ready. The nature of the problem demands a balanced approach that ensures competitiveness and protects American jobs.”

###

Rep. Wes Culver says Hoosiers need to embrace alternative energy sources

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 18, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

From the Goshen News http://www.goshennews.com/local/local_story_168113550.html

By JESSE DAVIS
jesse.davis@goshennews.com

Published: June 17, 2009 11:33 am—

NAPPANEE — Now is the time for Indiana to address the future of alternative energy.

State Rep. Wes Culver, R-Goshen, delivered that thought among other messages while speaking at McCormick Motors in Nappanee Saturday, when both the car dealership and UNL Furs, a fur buying and trading business also located in Nappanee, were recognized by the Indiana Renewable Energy Association for steps taken toward energy conservation. McCormick had a solar grid-tied system installed in February, while UNL Furs installed off-site solar and wind systems late last year.

Culver said Americans in general only tend to appreciate the impact of alternative energy when the cost of traditional energy sources, such as automobile gasoline, are high.

“The American mindset is if gas is $2.50 or less, we’re OK, and if it’s more, then it’s not OK, but it’s only that day that they look at it,” Culver said. “A year ago, when gas was $4, it was a crisis. Then gas went down and everyone forgot about it.”

He said the result of such attitudes in Indiana is compounded by difficulties within the Statehouse that keep alternative energy legislation from passing. Among those difficulties, according to Culver, is the idea that anyone interested in alternative energy wants the same things, such as an end to the use of coal. That creates significant pressure against such measures, especially from legislators located farther south where Indiana’s coal deposits are located.

“They’re thinking that anyone interested in alternative energy wants to shut down coal, and they have all these people in their district that produce coal, and all these utility companies that are built around making their energy off coal,” Culver said. “And then you get these utility companies that come down and say ‘Hey, don’t vote for this bill because it’s hurting the coal industry, and if you do that, utility prices for Hoosiers are going to skyrocket and you don’t want that.”

A bill on net metering, a policy allowing consumers who generate their own energy to sell a certain amount back into the grid for retail credit, was the most recent casualty. Current state law allows energy generators to sell up to 100 kilowatt-hours back into the grid, which Culver said was tied for the lowest amount in the nation. Different bills have suggested a new limit of up to five megawatt-hours.

The main problem with that bill, Culver said, was that it was too cluttered. Although the concept of net metering has drawn solid support from the legislature, it was the additional items within the bill that doomed it. Those items included requirements for utility companies to produce a certain amount of their energy through alternative means by 2015, 2020 and 2025, and also included a tax credit system.“

I remember talking to Ryan (Mishler, a state senator) at 11:30 at night on the last day, and I’m like ‘are these bills going to come out of committee?’ and he said ‘no, it was killed, can’t get a signature on them,’” Culver said.

Another major hindrance in the Statehouse he noted was a partisan divide on the basic issue of alternative energy. Democrats, he said, tend to be more energy-minded, while Republicans are focused on other topics. Culver called himself an “odd duck” in being both Republican and interested in the expanded future use of alternative energy. He later referenced that aspect of his personal efforts in discussing his fight for net metering.

“I’m in their ranks, behind the lines, and I’ve stood up and made this presentation to our caucus, and that’s part of the reason I think we were able to get 20-plus votes coming out of (the Republican caucus) for net metering,” he said.

He also talked about what he called “smoke and mirrors” in the last legislative session, when coal was classified as alternative energy so long as sulfur and other negative outputs were sequestered underground.

Near the end of his comments, Culver also issued a challenge to consumers.

“We need to change, as Americans, how we use energy,” he said.

Rep. Wes Culver (R-Goshen) is a freshman member of the Indiana General Assembly. Visit his official website at http://www.in.gov/r49 or read his Energy Plan at http://electwesculver/energy/html.

Green energy creates jobs

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 17, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

The following letter to the editor from Eric Cotton appeared in the Muncie Star Press on June 16, 2009, in response to a letter to the editor from Shirley Reese which appeared on June 8, 2009.

Muncie Star Press

June 16, 2009

Green energy creates jobs

by ERIC COTTON, ECI Wind and Solar LLC, Fairmount

Recently, Shirley Reese asked in her letter, "Green has a cost," what the bottom line is for green jobs and renewable energy. As a partner with ECI Wind and Solar, let me provide some business insights.

The bottom line is energy that comes from the sun, wind, biomass, and geothermal heat is free forever -- after you invest in the capital needed to harness it. It's also inherently domestic, so jobs and revenue stay local.

As for oil and coal: No one is saying these absolutely cannot be used. In fact, our electricity demand grows by 1 percent per month in the U.S. Even with rapid and aggressive deployment of renewable energy sources, we will struggle to keep up with our increase in demand. Coal and other traditional energy resources will still be in our energy portfolio.

To make these sources viable, we need to close the carbon loophole that allows the fossil fuel industry to displace the economic impacts of their pollution onto the taxpayer -- and we do pay dearly, both in public health costs and diminished ecosystem services.

As for jobs, the bottom line is that renewable energy -- and energy efficiency -- creates at least twice as many jobs per megawatt and per dollar as fossil fuels. Much of renewable energy is manufactured and installed: There are just inherently more man-hours involved than in traditional energy sources. While Mike Pence is decrying the costs of renewable energy, renewable energy is creating jobs right here in Muncie via Brevini.

Eric Cotton is a partner in ECI Wind and Solar in Fairmount. He is a founding member of the Indiana Renewable Energy Association and currently serves as the Vice President of the Board of Directors. Cotton can be reached at 765-702-0231 or eric@eciwindandsolar.com.

June 8, 2009

Green has a cost

by SHIRLEY REESE, Selma

I read in the paper that State Sen. Sue Errington, D-Muncie, and the liberal activist group MoveOn.org are pals. They are putting forth the idea that we must have clean energy jobs. Please explain to me what are these clean energy jobs and how much is it going to cost Muncie and Indiana? How many jobs will be lost when green jobs are created?

Congresswoman Michele Bachman says green jobs mean jobs lost. Spain found that for every green job created, 2.2 jobs were lost.

What are the hidden costs? I would be interested in knowing because we have learned that there are always repercussions when organizations like MoveOn.org are involved. Their agenda is always couched in attractive language such as "creating incentives, and renewable energy standards for American businesses," (laws and mandates). What is the bottom line?

The Windy City of Chicago might look good with a windmill on every block, but Indiana? No one seems to want a field of ghostly, noisy windmills in their back yards.

The Star Press article said they want to hear from ordinary Hoosiers. I'm asking the senator and MoveOn.org why can't all forms of energy be used? What is wrong with drilling for oil and using the clean coal methods that we have?

I will contact my representative, but it won't be Evan Bayh. I'll be contacting Mike Pence. I am getting sick of the term "green." It used to be a favorite color, but not any more.

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG