Duke Energy CEO doubts coal industry ‘revival’

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 20, 2017  /   Posted in Duke Energy, solar  /   No Comments

lynn good mk004

Melissa Key

Lynn Good, CEO of Duke Energy, speaks at the Hood Hargett luncheon on Wednesday at the Palm Restaurant.

Duke Energy CEO doubts coal industry ‘revival’

John Downey, Senior Staff Writer - Charlotte Business Journal

Duke Energy CEO Lynn Good says despite talk of “reviving the coal industry” in the Trump administration, coal remains economically and environmentally challenged — and Duke won’t change its move away from the fuel.

“We have to look through the changes of administration, the changes in politics and set our vision on where we want our company to be and what strategy we are pursuing,” she told more than 70 attendees during the Hood Hargett Breakfast Club luncheon at The Palm Wednesday. “Our strategy will continue to be to drive carbon out of our business.”

She said the economics of coal “are really challenged” and that it would prove more important than any government position. Referring to public policy, she said, “So when I think about administrations, the only person running Duke Energy for 2025, 2030 and 2035 is Duke Energy.”

Nuclear winter

The future of coal was one of more than a dozen audience questions Good addressed as the luncheon’s featured speaker. She last addressed the group three years ago.

She also addressed the future of new nuclear plant construction at Duke (NYSE:DUK), making that sound only a little more likely than development of a new coal plant. And, she made it clear that's not something Duke is looking at short-term.

“You may have been reading about something called the Westinghouse bankruptcy,” she told the audience, referring to Westinghouse Electric Co.’s March 29 filing for Chapter 11 protection from creditors. That filing came after Westinghouse lost more than $6.2 billion as the principal contractor for the only two new-generation U.S. nuclear projects in the United States.

License extension

She said that Duke’s proposed Lee Nuclear Station is supposed to employ the Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear reactor that has been the subject of construction delays and significant cost overruns at SCANA Corp.’s V.C. Summer Nuclear Station in Jenkinsville, SC., and Southern Co.’s Plant Vogtle in Waynesboro, Ga.

“So we are watching this very carefully,” she said. “But new nuclear takes 7 to 10 years to build, it’s a sizable capital investment and we’ve got some uncertainty right now with the vendor.”

Given that situation, Good said, “Our focus is on maintaining what we have, making those plants survive as long as they possibly can.”

Duke operates 11 nuclear reactors at six sites across the Carolinas. She called them “some of the most valuable assets in the region,” and says the company is inclined to seek regulatory permission to operate them for 20 years beyond their current 60-year licensing limit.

Power transformation

Good took questions for about 40 minutes after a brief speech to the group. In those opening remarks Good focused factors driving transformation at Duke.

She spoke about the Duke’s evolving relationship with customers, and its efforts to be more responsive and to make more information available to the people and businesses on its grid. She outlined efforts to invest in the power delivery system, including Duke’s plans to spend $13 billion over the next 10 years to upgrade the grid.

And she asserted Duke remains committed to providing more clean energy for customers. She said solar has to be an important part of that. But she also counted the move to natural gas from coal as providing cleaner energy and she said the nuclear, which provides 40% of the power in the Carolinas, needs to remain an important part of the energy mix because it provided base load power without carbon emissions.

Fragmented industry

She discussed the recent acquisitions — Progress Energy and Piedmont Natural Gas — and predicted the consolidation in the energy industry would continue.

In response to an audience question, she said power remains a fragmented industry when other utility-style business like telecommunications have long since consolidated largely because the states tend to have such a large role in regulating the power industry. The need for state approval on some many mergers makes completing them more difficult, she said.

“For every merger that closes, there’s one that doesn’t because they couldn’t get regulatory approval to consolidate,” she said.

The telecommunications industry, on the other hand, is regulated largely at the federal level.

She said the fragmentation is even greater in the natural gas industry — in which Duke hopes to expand now following the Piedmont purchase.

John Downey covers the energy industry and public companies for the Charlotte Business Journal.


Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG