Author Archives Laura Arnold

Rep. Pierce introduces feed-in tariff (FIT) bill during 2014 Indiana General Assembly

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   January 15, 2014  /   Posted in 2014 Indiana General Assembly, Feed-in Tariffs (FiT)  /   No Comments

State Rep. Matt Pierce (D-Bloomington) has introduced a bill during the 2014 session of the Indiana General Assembly to require the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) to adopt rules to  establish feed-in tariffs (FITs) for electric utilities.

Although Rep. Pierce has introduced FIT bills in prior sessions of the Indiana General Assembly, this proposed legislation is a significant departure from earlier proposed legislation. Instead of a very prescriptive bill detailing the type of FITs that should be established and offered by Indiana electric utilities the bill outlines an overall policy and guiding principles by the IURC.

Two Indiana electric utilities have already offered voluntary feed-in tariffs or VFITs, namely, Indianapolis Power and Light (IPL) and Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO). IPL's feed-in tariff called Rate REP for renewable energy production has expired and now approximately 100 MW's of solar PV projects are currently under construction or have recently come on-line.

The initial NIPSCO FIT  (FIT 1.0) program is now nearly full except for small wind projects 5-10 kWs, however, a petition was filed in 2013 by NIPSCO for a FIT 2.0 tariff. The NIPSCO FIT 2.0 proposal is currently pending before the IURC in Cause No. 44393.

Indiana Distributed Energy Alliance is an intervenor in this current case before the IURC.  A request for a continuance on the current time schedule was filed on 1/10/14 with the IURC to allow parties to the case to continue to discuss settlement negotiations. To learn more please contact Laura.Arnold@IndianaDG.net or (317) 635-1701.

http://iga.in.gov/legislative/2014/bills/house/1374/#   <<< Click here for details.

HB 1374 DIGEST

Feed-in tariff for renewable energy facilities. Requires the utility regulatory commission (IURC) to adopt rules to establish an electric utility feed-in tariff (FIT) program. Provides that the rules adopted must do the following: (1) Require all jurisdictional electric utilities (utilities) to offer a FIT to eligible customers (including persons that are not existing customers of the electric utility) not later than July 1, 2015. (2) Require utilities, upon the request of an eligible customer, to enter into a contract, for a term of at least 20 years, for the purchase of electricity generated by a renewable energy facility (facility) located in Indiana at a site at which the utility provides, or will provide, retail electric service to the eligible customer. (3) Prohibit a utility from requiring a minimum size or capacity for participating facilities, subject to any: (A) program participation cap; or (B) maximum size or capacity limit (which must allow facilities with less than 20 megawatt capacities to participate) for any one participating facility; that the IURC may approve. (4) Establish appropriate standards for interconnections between facilities and utilities' electric systems. (5) Establish appropriate FITs for participating facilities, with separate rates for electricity generated from each type of qualifying renewable energy resource under the program. (6) Require that any renewable energy credit or clean energy credit earned by a utility under the program be retired. (7) Prohibit an electric utility from requiring that a person that otherwise qualifies to participate in the electric utility's FIT program to be a customer of the electric utility for any period of time before enrolling in the electric utility's FIT program. Requires the IURC to ensure that the program complies with certain federal laws, regulations, and orders. Requires the IURC to develop and make available a standard contract for use by utilities in entering into contracts with eligible customers under the program. Provides that a nonjurisdictional electric utility may offer a FIT program to eligible customers at any time under terms and conditions that: (1) are just and reasonable to the utility's customers and in the public interest; and (2) comply with certain federal laws, regulations, and orders, to the extent applicable. Requires the IURC to include certain information concerning the program in its annual report to the regulatory flexibility committee.
Watch this website for more details!

Does Indiana need CWIP for new nuclear plants? CAC: nukes too risky, too expensive and Wall Street won’t support without CWIP

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   January 15, 2014  /   Posted in 2014 Indiana General Assembly, Edwardsport IGCC Plant, Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M), Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO), Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Click below for story >

Nuclear power for Indiana?

[To read a copy of SB 302 visit http://iga.in.gov/legislative/2014/bills/senate/302/]

...

The Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana said CWIP financing has stung Indiana ratepayers in the Edwardsport case and should be avoided for nuclear plants.

"The only reason utility companies need CWIP is because those investments are too risky, too expensive, and Wall Street won't support them, similar to the Edwardsport (plant)," said Kerwin Olson, the group's executive director. "If an investment is sound, then CWIP isn't needed. If it's not a good investment for shareholders, why is it a good investment for consumers?"

...

Indiana Gov. Pence State of State address at 7 p.m. Tues. 1/14/14; Watch on-line tonight! Tweet using #INSOTS

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   January 14, 2014  /   Posted in 2014 Indiana General Assembly, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

By Erika Brock
TheStatehouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS – Gov. Mike Pence is scheduled to talk about property taxes and preschool when he give his second State of State address at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the House chambers during a joint session of the General Assembly.

Gov. Mike Pence told lawmakers in his first State of the State address in 2013 on Tuesday that an income tax cut would bolster the state's economy. Lawmakers eventually agreed to give him half the cut he wanted. Photo by Lindsay Wenning, TheStatehouseFile.com

Gov. Mike Pence told lawmakers in his first State of the State address in 2013 on Tuesday that an income tax cut would bolster the state’s economy. Lawmakers eventually agreed to give him half the cut he wanted. Photo by Lindsay Wenning, TheStatehouseFile.com

The address will be live-streamed at www.in.gov/gov/2014stateofstate.htm.

“My message is going to be that we need to build on momentum,” Pence said recently as he was working on the address. “Indiana is strong and growing stronger.”

The governor’s office is urging listeners to tweet about the speech using #INSOTS.

Pence has already announced the major pieces of his agenda. He plans to ask lawmakers to release $400 million in transportation funds that the General Assembly set aside last year for future road projects, create a voucher program to pay for preschool for low-income children, and phase out the property tax on business equipment.

The vouchers for preschools would be available to children of families whose household income is up to 185 percent of the federal poverty level, which is currently $43,567 for a family of four.

The business personal property tax provides $1 billion for local governments and schools. Pence has not released a plan to replace the revenue. He said it’s up to lawmakers to create a “tax reform” package that doesn’t unduly hurt local governments.

Erika Brock is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) Nominating Committee Accepting Applications for Two Commission Vacancies

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   January 07, 2014  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 6, 2014
Contact: Christy Denault
cdenault@gov.in.gov

IURC Nominating Committee Accepting Applications for Commission

 
INDIANAPOLIS – The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Nominating Committee is soliciting applications from persons interested in filling two current vacancies on the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) created by the resignations of Commissioners Kari Bennett and Larry Landis.
Applications will be accepted today through close of business on January 21, 2014.  Applications must be received in the Governor’s Office by close of business on January 21, 2014.  After the close of the application period, the nominating committee will schedule and conduct a public meeting on January 31, 2014 to interview applicants.  The committee will present Governor Mike Pence with a list of six qualified candidates from which he will select two to fill the remainder of Bennett and Landis’ terms.  Commissioner Bennett’s term expires March 31, 2014.  Commissioner Landis’ term expires December 31, 2015.
Members of the nominating committee include Committee Chair Gwen Horth, Eric Scroggins, John Blevins, Larry Buell, Win Moses, and Michael Mullett.
Applications for the position may be obtained by emailing boardsandcommissions@gov.in.gov, by calling 317-232-4567, by hard copy in Statehouse, Room 206, or by visiting http://www.in.gov/gov/2682.htm. Completed applications should be returned to:  Gwen Horth, Chair, IURC Nominating Committee, c/o Office of the Governor, Statehouse, Room 206, Indianapolis, IN  46204.
###

Columbus Dispatch: AEP’s power play: de-emphasizing electricity plants; Focus on expanding transmission system

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   January 06, 2014  /   Posted in Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M)  /   No Comments

AEP's power play: de-emphasizing electricity plants

Nick Akins, president, CEO, and soon to be chairman, of Columbus-based American Electric Power

By  Dan Gearino

The Columbus Dispatch Sunday December 29, 2013 6:07 AM

American Electric Power is in the middle of rapid change, and the man at the controls is just getting started. • Nick Akins, president and CEO of the Columbus-based utility, has been in charge for two years, presiding over a transformation of the company’s structure and a shifting notion of what AEP needs to do to remain relevant in a changing energy landscape.

In doing so, the company is de-emphasizing what was once a crown jewel, the fleet of Ohio power plants, and putting a greater focus on developing an interstate network of power lines.

“The less we have to spend on centralized generation, the better off we are,” he said in a recent interview.

When he says “centralized generation,” he means big power plants. AEP will be closing more plants than it is building.

The company is shifting resources so it can expand its transmission system, made up of the high-voltage power lines that carry electricity across state lines and between metro areas. AEP already has the largest transmission system in the country, with 38,964 miles of lines in 11 states. Its new projects, including several joint ventures, include several stretches of 765-kilovolt lines, which are the equivalent of a superhighway.

Akins, 53, has worked his entire career for AEP and the former Central and South West Corp., which merged with AEP.

In November, he said the company would spend $4.5 billion on transmission projects from 2014 to 2016, which is a substantial share of the parent company’s $11.4 billion capital budget for those years. He estimated that earnings from the transmission activities would nearly double from 2013 to 2014.

AEP’s focus on transmission began under Akins’ predecessor, Michael Morris, and then was clarified and broadened in the first few months of Akins’ tenure. The company has developed a series of transmission projects that will provide reliable financial returns at a time when the industry’s main sources of income are flat.

“They’re ahead of their pack in terms of jumping on the transmission bandwagon,” said Julien Dumoulin-Smith, a utility analyst for UBS Securities.

And now, other utilities — including Akron-based FirstEnergy — have followed this year with their own strategy shifts to invest more in interstate power-line projects. AEP’s advantage is that it is already deep into the process of financing and gaining regulatory approval for the projects, while others are just beginning.

“These guys have been in the kitchen for a large number of projects for a large number of years,” Dumoulin-Smith said.

Shifting focus

While the company pumps money into interstate power lines, it is de-emphasizing its Ohio power plants.

At the behest of Ohio regulators in 2011, the company agreed to split its Ohio operations into two companies: one that delivers power and handles billing, and one that owns and operates power plants.

The separation means that AEP’s power plants will no longer directly serve the utility’s customers in the state. Instead, the plants will sell electricity on the open market, while the delivery business will purchase electricity on the market for its customers. AEP’s power plants probably will serve a portion of the company’s customers, but only through a competitive-bidding process in which other companies have the opportunity to offer a lower price.

AEP, which was reluctant to split its Ohio operations, has responded by focusing on the delivery business.

Meanwhile, the Ohio power plants are a shrinking asset. Because of environmental rules and the age of some of the plants, the company has announced a series of shutdowns that will occur over the next few years.

Also, AEP is in the process of transferring two plants away from Ohio regulation. The plants, both of which are in West Virginia near the Ohio line, will be regulated in nearby states that allow a utility to sell electricity directly to consumers.

Once the moves are complete, AEP will have 8,668 megawatts of power-plant capacity in the new Ohio power-plant subsidiary, which will be down from 11,652 megawatts today.

Akins says the company is responding to an economic climate in which there is little reason to build power plants in Ohio. The state’s electricity demand has been flat, and the regulatory structure provides no clear way to pay for plant construction.

“You wind up with what I call ‘the big doughnut,’ ” Akins said. “Ohio is essentially the hole in the middle because there hasn’t been any support for generation in that region.”

Todd Snitchler, chairman of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, does not see any reason for alarm about the wave of power-plant shut-downs.

“From the short-term perspective, I think what we’re seeing is that the market forces are wringing out some of the inefficiencies that have been in the (power-plant) fleet,” he said.

That said, his agency is monitoring the schedule of plant shutdowns and working with various companies to make sure that changes in the electricity supply are gradual.

AEP’s power plants will be spun off into their own subsidiary on Tuesday. Ohio customers probably won’t notice any change for a while, as rates have been set through mid-2015.

Considering the company’s lack of emphasis on the Ohio plants, many observers are asking if AEP plans to sell these assets. Akins isn’t ruling out a sale.

“I think the verdict is still out,” he said.

Market conditions mean there is little downside to selling the plants, according to analysts. The wholesale price of electricity is so low that power-plant operators are struggling to meet their sales targets.

The risk in selling the plants is that wholesale prices might rebound, and the owners of plants will see a surge in income. If AEP no longer owns plants in Ohio, the new owners will be the beneficiaries of any price increase.

 Taking the lead

Taken as a whole, AEP’s strategic shifts have turned the company into a trend-setter for its industry, said Paul Fremont, an analyst for Jeffries & Co.

“The company has moved from being a follower to, for the first time in a long time, potentially leading on ideas,” he said.

He attributes the shift to Akins’ decisive management style and to the way the market and regulators have forced AEP to make hard choices.

The company’s board of directors rewarded Akins for his efforts by naming him chairman, a move that takes effect on Wednesday. He will continue to hold the titles of president and CEO. He will be replacing Morris, who has served as non-executive chairman for the past two years.

Akins says he’s having fun and is eager to see the work of the past two years come to fruition.

“We are now at a point where we can start defining our success,” he said. “Before, we had a huge anvil we were dragging around, whether it be environmental expense or whether it be other things we were dealing with that were reactionary. We’re finally at a point where we can map out the strategy of this company going forward. It is exhilarating.”

dgearino@dispatch.com

@dispatchenergy

 

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG